<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 2011 Caches &#8211; Best Caches?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dartmoorgeocaching.co.uk/the-new-caches-of-2011/new-caches-2011-best-caches/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dartmoorgeocaching.co.uk</link>
	<description>Caching in the Wild</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 22:06:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tamerton Chocolates		</title>
		<link>https://www.dartmoorgeocaching.co.uk/the-new-caches-of-2011/new-caches-2011-best-caches/comment-page-1#comment-30</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tamerton Chocolates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dartmoorgeocaching.co.uk/?page_id=454#comment-30</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The API for third party applications will return members only caches without checking if the person running the query is a member (or at least it used to). When I started geocaching I used to cache &#038; log finds through a Symbian app called geocache navigator. It took me a while (and a strict email from Miss) to figure out why I couldn&#039;t see the caches I logged on the website (but they did count as a find)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The API for third party applications will return members only caches without checking if the person running the query is a member (or at least it used to). When I started geocaching I used to cache &amp; log finds through a Symbian app called geocache navigator. It took me a while (and a strict email from Miss) to figure out why I couldn&#8217;t see the caches I logged on the website (but they did count as a find)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Miss		</title>
		<link>https://www.dartmoorgeocaching.co.uk/the-new-caches-of-2011/new-caches-2011-best-caches/comment-page-1#comment-27</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dartmoorgeocaching.co.uk/?page_id=454#comment-27</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes - there is a loophole in the system.  Quite useful for members of the same family where only one is PM.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes &#8211; there is a loophole in the system.  Quite useful for members of the same family where only one is PM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: forgetful elephant		</title>
		<link>https://www.dartmoorgeocaching.co.uk/the-new-caches-of-2011/new-caches-2011-best-caches/comment-page-1#comment-26</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[forgetful elephant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dartmoorgeocaching.co.uk/?page_id=454#comment-26</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oh my....I had not noticed that Joy No. 10 had gained that many favourites.  Thank you]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my&#8230;.I had not noticed that Joy No. 10 had gained that many favourites.  Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dartmoor Dave		</title>
		<link>https://www.dartmoorgeocaching.co.uk/the-new-caches-of-2011/new-caches-2011-best-caches/comment-page-1#comment-22</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dartmoor Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dartmoorgeocaching.co.uk/?page_id=454#comment-22</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I wondered if anybody would comment on that.  Only premium members get favourites to award and the percentage only includes premium members.  So in this case 2 of the finds were not premium members.  However, this is a premium member only cache so this shouldn&#039;t happen.  I have checked other caches and the same has occured. Either they were premium members at the time they logged it or there is a loophole in the system that allows non premium members to log a premium member only cache. I will investigate further.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wondered if anybody would comment on that.  Only premium members get favourites to award and the percentage only includes premium members.  So in this case 2 of the finds were not premium members.  However, this is a premium member only cache so this shouldn&#8217;t happen.  I have checked other caches and the same has occured. Either they were premium members at the time they logged it or there is a loophole in the system that allows non premium members to log a premium member only cache. I will investigate further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Miss		</title>
		<link>https://www.dartmoorgeocaching.co.uk/the-new-caches-of-2011/new-caches-2011-best-caches/comment-page-1#comment-21</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 11:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dartmoorgeocaching.co.uk/?page_id=454#comment-21</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great Scientists II: Bardeen, Br - 4 favourites in 6 finds - not 100%!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Scientists II: Bardeen, Br &#8211; 4 favourites in 6 finds &#8211; not 100%!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
